How VCs Really Get Paid

The Early - 10th Edition

Hi all! Hope everyone’s having a great week! As always, thanks all for following and for checking out the job board! Some exciting roles posted this week (a lot of internship positions 👀) and we also have more resources in the works 🙂

Not a subscriber? Sign up below for early-career VC jobs, news & resources straight to your inbox 🤗 

💹 Today’s schedule:

New VC Roles This Week 💫 

Internships 🤓 
Analyst 😍 
Associate/Senior Associate 😄 
Operational Roles 🤠 

Roles Still Open From Last Week 🏃‍♀️ 

❗️ Note that many VC roles are posted without application deadlines and filled on a rolling basis - if you see one you like, I’d recommend applying within a week, or as soon as possible!

How VCs Are Paid 💵 

Today I wanted to walk through VC comp, which can be an opaque subject if you haven’t worked in the space. When I started, I didn’t have a clue how size of fund, returns, and fund structure all factor into how team members are paid. ⬇️ 

Many VC firms operate using a ‘2% and 20%’ structure. This means that, in a given fund, 2% of total AUM (assets under management) will be spent on management fees annually, and the investments team will also receive 20% of the total profits of the fund.

💡 To walk through an example of the 2% and 20% model:

If you have a $100M fund:

  • ~2% of the fund - in this case, $2M - will be spent on management fees annually. Management fees cover the salaries of all team members, as well as other admin costs such as travel, hosting events, office costs, etc. So, if a fund has a lifecycle of 5 years during which capital is deployed, $10M of the total fund will go to management fees over its lifetime.

  • In addition to the management fees (which, in this structure, are provided irrespective of performance), VC teams also receive 20% of the firm’s investment profits.

  • So, if a $100M firm hits a 3x return (generates $300M from $100M,) you would first subtract $100M from the overall return, leaving you with $200M. The VC team would then receive 20% of this amount, or $40M, as their share of the profit. The remaining 80% will be allocated to the firm’s LPs (limited partners.)

Note: General partners typically contribute a percentage of their own capital to their fund to show they have skin in the game (typically ~2% of total fund size.) So, when raising a $100M fund, ~$2M may be contributed by the management team themselves.

Here is a great article from TechCrunch with details about different kinds of fund structures.

VC Fund Structure Q&A 💭 

💡 Are all investment team members required (or strongly encouraged) to contribute their own capital to their fund?

No. At the junior investor level, especially analyst and associate roles, investors are usually not expected to contribute their own capital. However, these positions often receive a smaller carry percentage. In my experience, investors will typically start contributing at the principal level and above (partner, managing partner, etc.) However, if you have the opportunity to put skin in the game, I would encourage doing so.

💡 Given this payment structure, should I join a larger fund (since management fees are higher in larger funds?)

Not necessarily. Though larger funds have more capital to work with, they also have bigger teams with more salaries to cover. As a result, comp varies widely depending on size of team, AUM, and geography. Personally, I would join the best team you can possibly find to learn from, even if it means a slightly lower base comp since VC is an apprenticeship model.

💡 What happens if the firm loses money/doesn’t have a positive return? Do VCs have to pay the difference?

VC teams don’t have to pay the difference for a poor-performing fund. Team members who contributed their own capital will be treated like an LP, with any available distributions going back to them first, but resulting in an overall loss on invested capital. Additionally, the management team will not receive any carry on the fund (which is where VCs make the majority of their money), since there are no profits to distribute.

This Week: Interview with Everett Sanderson 👏 

This week, I’m excited to be chatting with my friend Everett Sanderson, investor at City Light VC where he focuses on the climate, edtech, and healthcare sectors. After graduating from Cornell, Everett worked in investment banking prior to joining City Light. Ask Everett a question below 👇️ 

Ask Everett a Question

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

A quick background on The Early’s interview series: I’ll be hosting guests to talk through career learnings & their experiences breaking into roles in VC, product, startups, and beyond 🤩 On a personal note, I made so many mistakes early on in my internship/job search processes, which turned into some of the most stressful times of my life (when they should have been exciting!) The goal of the series is to help share learnings and support early-career professionals in their own journeys.

I’ll be sharing written highlights from these interviews via this newsletter, and will also upload the full conversations to my YouTube channel 🙂 

We have upcoming guests from the Westly Group, 11Tribes and more! 🙌 

Poll: Rate the Early Newsletter 💭 

Did you enjoy this newsletter? Let me know! :)

I want to make these resources as helpful as possible - your thoughts are much appreciated!

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Refer a Friend 👭 

Enjoying the newsletter? Click the button below to refer a friend 🙂 

Resources 📝 

Say Hi! 👋 

And that’s all for this week! You can find me on LinkedIn, Instagram, and X. As always, feel free to reach out to [email protected] with any questions and/or feedback. I’d love to hear from you!🙂 

-Mic

Reply

or to participate.